Six questions, an honest answer. The same framework our team uses with clients before they spend a cent on legal setup.
Your recommendation
Based on 0 of 6 answered. Score updates as you go.
Rule of thumb
Under 20 people, short horizon, no local invoicing? EOR usually wins. Long-term, scaled, regulated or trading? Entity earns its keep.
The matrix
Worked scenarios
One senior salesperson in Germany to test demand. No local invoicing yet.
EOR. Speed and zero setup cost matter more than entity ownership at this stage.
Building a long-term engineering centre in India over 3 years.
Entity. At scale, per-employee fees overtake the cost of running a local subsidiary.
Acquired a 12-person team in Brazil, deciding the long-term structure.
Start on EOR to keep payroll uninterrupted, then convert to entity within 12 to 18 months.
Hiring licensed staff in the UAE to operate under your DFSA licence.
Entity. Regulated activity usually requires a locally licensed legal employer.
The crossover
On a typical engagement, EOR fees and entity running costs cross around 15 to 25 employees in one country, depending on local payroll complexity and average salary. Below that line, EOR is almost always the lower total cost. Above it, an entity starts to pay back the setup investment.
Indicative annual cost, one country
Indicative ranges from Agile client engagements. Real crossover depends on country, salary band, and benefit complexity.
The hybrid path
The cleanest play for most growing companies: start on EOR to hire in days, prove the market, then convert to your own entity when headcount and trading activity justify it. Agile runs both sides, so the transition is an admin exercise, not a payroll outage.
See how Agile runs EORGet our latest compliance updates, salary reports, and strategy guides delivered straight to your inbox.
Our global employment specialists are available now. Real answers to your specific compliance and hiring questions.